<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gts 250 vs 4850</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pcgamersera.com/2009/06/gts-250-vs-4850/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pcgamersera.com/2009/06/gts-250-vs-4850/</link>
	<description>Pc Hardware ,Gadgets,Gaming &#38; Windows News &#38; Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GTS250fan</title>
		<link>http://pcgamersera.com/2009/06/gts-250-vs-4850/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>GTS250fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcgamersera.com/?p=1099#comment-184</guid>
		<description>GTS 250 outplays the ATI model in all areas. go GTS 250.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GTS 250 outplays the ATI model in all areas. go GTS 250.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azfar</title>
		<link>http://pcgamersera.com/2009/06/gts-250-vs-4850/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Azfar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcgamersera.com/?p=1099#comment-182</guid>
		<description>What about the less power needed for gts250 and lower temps then 4850?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the less power needed for gts250 and lower temps then 4850?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GTS 250 vs. 4850 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://pcgamersera.com/2009/06/gts-250-vs-4850/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>GTS 250 vs. 4850 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcgamersera.com/?p=1099#comment-149</guid>
		<description>[...] both have equal pros and cons .lets make is simple take whichever u get cheaper read this http://pcgamersera.com/2009/06/gts-250-vs-4850/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] both have equal pros and cons .lets make is simple take whichever u get cheaper read this <a href="http://pcgamersera.com/2009/06/gts-250-vs-4850/" rel="nofollow">http://pcgamersera.com/2009/06/gts-250-vs-4850/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
